Since the approval of Raptiva (efalizumab) in October 2003, the FDA has received reports of three confirmed cases and one possible case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) in patients who were 47 to 73 years of age who were using Raptiva for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Two of the patients with confirmed PML and one patient with possible PML died. All four patients were treated with Raptiva continuously for more than three years.  None of the patients were receiving other treatments that suppress the immune system while taking Raptiva.

PML is a rare, serious, progressive neurologic disease caused by a virus that affects the central nervous system.  When PML occurs, it is usually in people whose immune systems have been severely weakened and often results in an irreversible decline in neurologic function and death. There is no known effective treatment for PML.

Raptiva works by affecting T-cells in the immune system.  The effects of Raptiva also decrease the function of the immune system and increase susceptibility to infections.

Raptiva was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in 2003. There were no cases of PML seen in the clinical trials that supported the approval of Raptiva.  At the time of approval, a total of 2,764 patients had been treated with Raptiva.  Of those 2,764 patients, 2400 had been treated for three months, 904 for six months, and 218 for one year or more.

In October 2008, the labeling for Raptiva was changed to highlight, in a Boxed Warning, the risks of life-threatening infections, including PML.  In addition, FDA directed Genentech, the manufacturer of Raptiva, to develop a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy, or REMS, to ensure that patients receive risk information about Raptiva.

The FDA is reviewing this latest information. The agency will take appropriate steps to ensure that the risks of Raptiva do not outweigh its benefits, that patients prescribed Raptiva are clearly informed of the signs and symptoms of PML, and that health care professionals carefully monitor patients for the possible development of PML.

Healthcare providers should, in the interim, be aware of the following information and advice:

* Raptiva increases the risk of PML.  Longer, continuous use may further increase this risk.
* Inform patients using Raptiva of the potential risk of developing PML.
* There are no known screening tests that can reliably predict PML or medical interventions that can prevent or treat this disease.
* Monitor patients being treated with Raptiva for the onset of neurologic symptoms.  Discontinue Raptiva if PML is suspected.
* Patients treated with Raptiva should be periodically re-evaluated to ensure that the benefit of treatment continues to outweigh the risks.  Consideration should be given to use of other approved therapies to control the patients’ psoriasis.
* The effects of periodic or intermittent use of Raptiva, or the concomitant use of other immunosuppressant drugs on the risk for PML is not known.

Patients using Raptiva should:

* Be aware that Raptiva increases the risk of developing PML.  PML is a disease that is fatal or causes severe disability.
* Talk with their healthcare provider about the benefits and risks of treatment with Raptiva.
* Be aware of the symptoms of PML which may include unusual weakness, loss of coordination, changes in vision, difficulty speaking and sometimes personality changes.
* Contact their healthcare provider immediately if they experience these symptoms.
* Understand that there are no laboratory screening tests for PML or medical interventions that can prevent or treat PML

The FDA asks health care providers and patients to report possible cases of PML to the FDA through the MedWatch program by phone (1-800-FDA-1088) or by the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/index.html.

{ 0 comments }

I’ve been reading a lot lately about raw apple cider vinegar and the various health benefits associated with two to six teaspoons a day mixed with water. My mother has severe arthritis, and I’ve been searching for natural remedies for her so she can get off of her 5 a day pain killer habit and have more mobility.

Besides working almost magically on pain and arthritis, raw apple cider vinegar is also supposed to help your body regain a normal pH balance. All of the sugar, meat, grain, and junk we eat all day really throws our pH out of whack and the raw apple cider vinegar is supposed to help restore the balance. Raw ACV is also supposed to work well for heartburn and “leaky gut syndrome.” This is what interests me most, since “leaky gut syndrome” is most often associated with psoriasis. There are many who believe that psoriasis is caused by toxic chemicals leaking out of the intestines and rising to the skin in the form of psoriasis outbreaks — it’s the body’s way of clearing away the excess toxins.

Now, if the theory holds true, my raw apple cider vinegar experiment should help with my leaky gut syndrome and my whacked out pH levels,  thus helping to clear up my psoriasis.

I’m going out today to find the raw, unprocessed, not distilled apple cider vinegar. I’m pretty sure I can’t get it at the local grocery store (they only sell filtered, processed, distilled, useless ACV), so I’m going to start with Whole Foods market. From what I’ve read, you need to get the rawest, purest form of apple cider vinegar for it to work it’s magic. This means it will be cloudy, dark, and have small chunks of apples floating around in it — the darker and murkier the better. If I find a good brand I will post it here in the comments.

My plan is to start with one tablespoon of raw apple cider vinegar mixed with one cup of water and a couple of tablespoons of honey to cut the taste. ACV has a very strong odor and taste, so don’t be shocked the first time you try to drink it — I hear the taste grows on you, especially when it starts to cure what ails you…

I’ll do my one teaspoon drink three times a day to start with and work my way up to six times a day. I’ll report back here with my findings.

Does anyone have any experience with raw apple cider vinegar?

{ 3 comments }

I just read a very interesting blog post over at HodgePodgeInk about treating psoriasis with raw milk. I’ve never thought of doing this, and I think some additional research into the subject would be useful to a lot of sufferers.

Raw milk is defined as being fresh from the cow with no anti-microbial treatment or pasteurization of any kind — simply raw, fresh milk straight from the dairy. A list of where you can find raw milk in your state is located here.

The original blog post cites a study performed in 1929 using raw milk to completely cure a terrible case of psoriasis, and the first commentor to the post makes a great contribution by stating that the cure may be related to the issue of Ph levels in the body. I’m off to research the Ph issue, and will report back soon.

Has anyone tried the raw milk treatment for psoriasis? Has anyone gone the Ph adjustment route by changing their diet so as to raise their internal Ph levels?

{ 6 comments }

I just saw this press release about ustekinumab, a new biologic treatment for psoriasis that is supposed to be as good as or even better than Enbrel. Read through the release below and let me know what you think. Personally, I’m scared to death of these biologic treatments—partly because I don’t want to give myself injections and partly because it’s pretty scary to be suppressing your immune system, even if it does show positive results when it comes to psoriasis treatment. I read all the latest research about psoriasis treatments, hoping to find some magical cure for this horrible condition, and most of the news lately seems to be about these biologic treatments. I was hoping the research would go the other way, toward more natural treatments—maybe some new plant in the Amazon rainforest that when eaten calms the overactive immune system that seems to be the root cause of psoriasis. Does anyone know of any research in the natural treatment area of psoriasis?

A Greater Proportion of Patients Receiving Ustekinumab Delivered in Two Subcutaneous Doses Achieved Significant Skin Clearance at the Primary Endpoint Compared with Patients Receiving Enbrel Delivered in 24 Subcutaneous Doses

HORSHAM, PA, September 18, 2008 — New findings from a Phase 3 multicenter, randomized head-to-head study comparing ustekinumab and Enbrel® (etanercept) for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis showed ustekinumab superior to Enbrel according to primary and major secondary efficacy endpoints.  The primary endpoint of the trial was the percentage of participants achieving at least a 75 percent reduction in psoriasis at week 12 as measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75).

At week 12, after two subcutaneous injections at weeks 0 and 4, 68 percent and 74 percent of patients receiving ustekinumab 45 mg or ustekinumab 90 mg, respectively, achieved a PASI 75 compared with 57 percent of patients receiving Enbrel 50 mg subcutaneous injections twice weekly for twelve weeks (P = 0.012 for ustekinumab 45 mg; P < 0.001 for ustekinumab 90 mg, each compared with Enbrel).  Investigators presented these data today at the 17th meeting of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) in Paris, France.

Ustekinumab is a new, investigational human monoclonal antibody with a novel mechanism of action that targets the cytokines interleukin-12 (IL-12) and interleukin-23 (IL-23), naturally occurring proteins that are important in the body’s regulation of immune responses and that are believed to play a role in immune-mediated inflammatory disorders, including psoriasis.

“These findings reinforce the promise of ustekinumab as an infrequently administered and highly effective biologic therapy for the treatment of adults with moderate to severe psoriasis,” said Bruce Strober, MD, PhD, Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States, and trial investigator.  “Currently available biologic therapies have greatly improved the treatment of psoriasis, yet unmet needs in treatment remain for patients living with this chronic inflammatory disease.”

Investigators also reported that patients receiving ustekinumab achieved higher marked improvements in psoriasis as assessed by PASI 90 improvement, or nearly complete clearance of psoriasis, and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores compared with patients receiving Enbrel, which were major secondary endpoints of the trial.  At week 12, 36 percent of patients receiving ustekinumab 45 mg and 45 percent of patients receiving ustekinumab 90 mg achieved PASI 90 compared with 23 percent of patients receiving Enbrel (P < 0.001 for each comparison versus Enbrel).

Moreover, a greater proportion of patients in the ustekinumab 45 mg and 90 mg treatment groups achieved a PGA score of “cleared” or “minimal” (65 percent and 71 percent, respectively) compared with patients in the Enbrel treatment group (49 percent) [P < 0.001 for each comparison versus Enbrel].

Through week 12, the comparator-controlled portion of the study, the percentages of study participants experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) were comparable between the ustekinumab 45 mg group (66 percent), the ustekinumab 90 mg group (68 percent) and the Enbrel 50 mg group (69 percent).  Those patients experiencing at least one serious AE were reported as follows: 1.9 percent and 1.2 percent of patients receiving 45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab, respectively, compared with 1.2 percent of patients receiving Enbrel.

AEs leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 1.9 percent and 1.2 percent of patients in the ustekinumab 45 mg and ustekinumab 90mg groups, respectively, compared with 2.3 percent of patients treated with Enbrel.  Rates of specific adverse events were generally comparable between treatment groups with the exception of injection site erythema which was reported in 14.7 percent of subjects treated with Enbrel versus 0.7 percent of subjects in the combined ustekinumab groups, though this disparity may have been influenced by the greater number of Enbrel injections required (up to 48 in the 12-week study) compared with two ustekinumab injections.

“This study is significant for the dermatology community as it is the first comparator trial of biologic therapies for psoriasis,” said Christopher Griffiths, MD, FRCP, School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, and lead trial investigator.

“Treatment with ustekinumab, which has a new mechanism of action that targets interleukins 12 and 23, has demonstrated significant clinical efficacy with infrequent self-administered injections.  Both are important considerations when evaluating the burden of disease for many adult patients living with moderate to severe psoriasis and who are candidates for a biologic treatment.”

About the ACCEPT Trial
The Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Ustekinumab Compared to Etancercept in the Treatment of Subjects with Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis (ACCEPT) included 903 patients with chronic plaque psoriasis (etanercept=347, ustekinumab 45 mg=209, ustekinumab 90 mg=347).

Patients were randomized to receive subcutaneously administered ustekinumab or etanercept.  Patients randomized to receive ustekinumab received 45 mg or 90 mg doses at weeks 0 and 4.  Patients in the etanercept group received twice-weekly doses of 50 mg for 12 weeks.  The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients who achieved PASI 75 at week 12.

About Psoriasis
Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated disease that results from the overproduction of skin cells, resulting in their accumulation on the surface of the skin, which causes red, scaly plaques that may itch and bleed.  It is estimated that approximately 7.5 million people in the United States and 10 million Europeans are living with psoriasis and nearly one-quarter of those people have cases that are considered moderate to severe.

About Ustekinumab
Ustekinumab is a new, human monoclonal antibody in Phase 3 development by Centocor, Inc. for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, and is being investigated as an infrequently administered subcutaneous injection.

Ustekinumab is a novel biologic therapy that targets interleukin 12 (IL-12) and interleukin 23 (IL-23), naturally occurring proteins that are important in regulating the immune system and that are believed to play a role in immune-mediated inflammatory disorders.

On June 17, 2008, the FDA’s Dermatologic and Ophthalmic Drugs Advisory Committee (DODAC) unanimously recommended ustekinumab for approval.  DODAC is convened on request of the FDA to review and evaluate safety and efficacy data of human drug products for use in the treatment of dermatologic and ophthalmologic conditions.

The committee provides non-binding recommendations based on its evaluation; however, the FDA makes the final decision on approval of the drug.  Ustekinumab is also under review by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA).

Centocor discovered ustekinumab and has exclusive marketing rights to the product in the United States.  Janssen-Cilag companies have exclusive marketing rights in all countries outside of the United States.

About Centocor, Inc.
Centocor is harnessing the power of world-leading research and biomanufacturing to deliver innovative biomedicines that transform patients’ lives. Centocor has already brought innovation to the treatment of Crohn’s disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, ulcerative colitis, pediatric Crohn’s disease and psoriasis.

The world leader in monoclonal antibody production and technology, Centocor has brought critical biologic therapies to patients suffering from debilitating immune disorders.

About Janssen-Cilag
Janssen-Cilag companies have a long track record in developing and marketing treatments for central nervous system disorders, pain management, infectious diseases, gastrointestinal disorders and oncology.

# # #

Enbrel is a registered trademark of Amgen and Wyeth Pharmaceuticals.

{ 0 comments }

Due to some fertility problems, I have been forced to discontinue my testosterone treatments. It has been three weeks now, and I can already see and feel the difference in my psoriasis. The patches are getting thicker and redder, and I am seeing some new spots popping up in random places.

I certainly have no scientific evidence that this increase in psoriais is related to my discontinuation of testosterone supplementation, but what I can see and feel both lead me to that conclusion. One could argue that it is all in my mind, and that my mind alone is causing the increase in psoriatic symptoms due to the increased focus on them as well as the increased anxiety I feel about the whole thing.

The bottom line is that those testosterone treatments (for whatever reason) have really been the only thing in the last 30 years that really dramatically reduced my psoriasis symptoms. Large patches cleared up, my nails cleared up completely, and new patches stopped appearing.

I want my testosterone back!

Needless to say, I am heading to my endocrinologist for a new T script immediately after I’m done fooling around with this fertility crap.

{ 0 comments }